If you are struggling right now — AU: Lifeline 13 11 14 · NZ: 1737 · Worldwide: findahelpline.com. This site is a record and a signpost — not a counselling or financial advice service.
CLAIMSDENIED.AUGIO IS A SUNCORP GROUP BRAND
IN BUILD A guide book and a directory for anyone disputing a claim. Being built in the open — new sections as they are ready.
BEING BUILT

FOR JOURNALISTS, PODCASTERS AND CONSUMER ADVOCATES.

The question is not whether one family got a bad outcome. It is whether the process that produced it was fair — and whether it would produce the same outcome for you.

2013 – 2023
TEN ASSESSMENTS.
NO CRACK.
Eight of the ten were produced by or for the insurer. Not one recorded a crack in the ground-floor slab.
2025 – 2026
PRE-EXISTING
DAMAGE
The same ground-floor slab. The structural claim declined.
SAME SLAB. SAME INSURER.
OPPOSITE ANSWER.
What changed — the ground-floor slab, or the insurer’s position?

The short version

Eight times in ten years the insurer’s own side examined this property. Ten assessments in all between 2013 and 2023 — engineers, a scoping builder, the insurer’s assessors. Not one of the ten recorded a crack in the ground-floor slab. GIO’s claim decision of 30 June 2023 reproduced its engineer’s observations word for word, and decided that claim on a record in which the ground-floor slab was uncracked.

In May 2025 floodwater went through the residence. GIO now declines the structural claim on the ground that the damage to that same ground-floor slab was pre-existing.

The independent structural engineer engaged for this claim reports that the ground-floor slab “has exceeded its Serviceable Limit and is considered to have failed to AS-2870”, and that “the house slab is now economically unrepairable. Demolition and replacement is now the only economical and warrantable outcome.”

An engineer says the residence must come down. GIO says $58,394.13 and “4 to 6 weeks”.

Does this seem fair to you!

The case in dated facts

What it costs to argue

Disputing an insurer's expert is not free. Consumer advocates price rebutting one report at $5,000–$10,000, and note that “the complaints authority does not have anything where you can dispute an expert finding” (Tyrone Shandiman, Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby, ABC News, May 2026).

This dispute has already cost this family well beyond those figures.

What we can give you

A dated record

Every step of this claim documented, dated and kept. Provided on request: GIO's 25 August 2026 letter; the engineer's report; GIO's written “4 to 6 weeks”; the temporary-accommodation terms. Consumer bodies and inquiries may use the whole file as a case study for submissions, research or testimony — consent is already given for that use.

A family on the record

Andrew Crane will speak on camera, on air and in print, by name, about this claim and about what the process does to a household. By phone, video or in person on the NSW mid-north coast. For podcasters: the whole arc, told by someone who kept every letter. Ninety minutes is fine. So is nine.

Vision and stills

Come and shoot it yourselves. The banners, the house, the street — you are welcome to photograph and film here, and Andrew will walk you through what you are looking at. We also hold our own photographs and footage of the residence, the banners and the street, which we can provide. Nine's 2023 broadcast is theirs and is linked, not supplied.

The systemic frame

AFCA received a record 119,949 complaints in 2025–26; general insurance accounted for 36,022. Across all financial products the top three issues were delay in claim handling, service quality and claim rejection. The parliamentary inquiry into small business insurance reports on 27 October 2026. We can put one household's file beside those numbers.

How we work with you

Write to media@claimsdenied.au

Put “Media”, “Podcast” or “Advocacy” in the subject line and it reaches the right inbox first. Documented record: claimsdenied.au.